Lesson Plan: Peer Recordings, or Revising Peer Review

Mac Scott

Lesson Plans, Multimodal Writing, Pedagogy

Close-up shot of a black keyboard on which rests a pen and a crumpled up piece of paper.

An important component in the composition process is peer reviews. In fact, it’s a requirement for RHE 306 courses. But when instructors assign digital writing assignments–particularly those like infographics that have a visual component beyond alphanumeric text–a question emerges as to how students can best provide helpful feedback.

In “Can You Hear Us Now,” Julie Reynolds and Vicki Russell argue that audio-recorded feedback on student writing encourages them as instructors to “focus less on lower-order writing concerns (such as spelling, punctuation, and grammar) than on higher-order writing concerns (such as the structure of arguments, overall organization, and use of sources)” (31). Additionally, audio feedback enables them to emphasize the nuances of their comments and the complexities of the choices students made and will make moving forward. Conducting a study where their students used audio recording for peer reviews, Reynolds and Russell maintain that students created higher quality reviews via audio feedback, but they tended to prefer writing and receiving written feedback, with students noting that it was difficult to both organize their ideas orally as reviewers and to process the information in the recording as writers (34-5). Despite student misgivings, Reynolds and Russell argue that audio feedback is beneficial, believing that student discomfort in providing and interpreting feedback can indicate a different critical engagement experience that students may not be accustomed to with written feedback.

More recently, in “Talking with Students through Screencasting,” Riki Thompson and Meredith J. Lee consider the impact of instructors providing feedback via screencasting software (I refer to this as “screen recording” below). They argue that screencasting feedback can facilitate a more personalized and conversational experience between instructor and student, which can help students interpret feedback as encouragement rather than detached criticism.

It’s important to note that both of these studies discuss the benefits (and frustrations) of using non-print feedback on traditional, print-based student writing. But when students are tasked to compose and revise multimodal compositions–for instance, infographics that contain data visualizations–it serves that they should also be able to review those texts in kind.

Learning Objectives

This lesson introduces students to an audiovisual peer review experience through Apple’s QuickTime screen recording software. Assuming students have already engaged in some form of alphanumeric peer reviews, the lesson is meant for classes that include a unit on multimodal compositions, e.g., infographics. In this sense, the lesson serves to build off and potentially augment student (and instructor) understanding of peer review based on the shift in technology.

Students will:

  • Identify and discuss the affordances and limitations of alphanumeric as well as audiovisual peer reviews
  • Collectively articulate and establish reviewing strategies as well as a template for reviews
  • Learn how to use screen recording software and share files with peers and the instructor
  • Record substantive, nuanced peer reviews
  • Assignment Length

    Two class periods

  • Required Materials

    DWRL Mac desktop computers with QuickTime screen recording software (built-in). Headsets checked out from DWRL offices. Google Drive accounts for students and instructor.

  • Skills Necessary

    Ability to use and teach students to use QuickTime screen recording as well as know how to upload and share files via Google Drive.

Access and Adaptability


The purpose of this lesson is to enable students to engage with infographics beyond the limitations of print-based writing, but this method of peer review should work with any type of digital writing. If instructors teach in a classroom without access to screen recording software but still ask their students to create multimodal compositions, students could review each other’s work through face-to-face conferences. In this sense, it may be beneficial to have students conduct peer reviews as they have with alphanumeric essays and supplement those texts with in-person communication.

Assignment Description


In this lesson, the class will write quick, print-based reviews of an infographic and discuss that experience. Afterwards, instructors will give students a brief tutorial on screen recordings and allow them to practice using the QuickTime software. Students will then create informal screen recordings where they review the same infographic as before. The class will then discuss this experience, and from this discussion the class will collectively create a peer review template to help students provide beneficial peer reviews through screen recording. Students then swap their infographic drafts with their review partners, and during the following class, they record and share their peer review recordings with their partners and the instructor.

Sample Infographic Review Using Screen Recording. Video transcription available in description in YouTube.

Instructor Preparation

  • Know how to use QuickTime’s screen recording software, as well as how to upload and share videos via Google Docs
  • Select an infographic for the peer review activity (unless you plan to ask for a volunteer)
  • Check out microphone headsets from the DWRL office

Student Preparation

  • Create a draft of an infographic, and be able to access it during the class
  • Write a brief cover letter concerning where they are in regards to their draft (e.g., what are they attempting to express with their draft, and what might be their next steps?). Include 3 questions or points of interest concerning what they’d like their partner to look at specifically (e.g., structural concerns, particular design elements, etc.).

In-Class or Assignment Instructions

  • Students discuss their experiences with peer reviews: What works? What doesn’t? What do they like, and what do they struggle with as reviewers and as writers? What are the possibilities and constraints of alphanumeric reviews?
  • Pull up an infographic on the projector. If instructors are asking students to create infographics, then they can use one of the examples provided at the start of the unit. Otherwise, instructors can easily find one online, or they could ask for a volunteer to share their draft with the class and receive extra feedback. Ask students to write a quick review of this infographic like they did in previous units (e.g., if instructors asked students in the previous unit[s] to write peer review letters, have them write an abridged review letter). Afterwards, ask a few students to read their reviews aloud, and then discuss the affordances and limitations of reviewing the infographic in this mode.
  • Switch gears, and show students how to use QuickTime’s screen recording software, and give them a few minutes to practice using it.
  • Ask students to review the infographic with the QuickTime screen recording software. Let them mess around recording both micro- and macro-level comments, as well as listening to their recordings. (The class will likely get loud at this time, but the microphone headsets available through the DWRL office do a good job of isolating commentary. In the Skills Workshop section, there’s important information on headsets.)
A pair of headphones lying on a table top.
  • Students discuss their experience. What worked, and what didn’t? How does this differ from alphanumeric feedback? What does it enable? What does it constrain? What are the concerns using screen recordings for peer reviews? What are some strategies for preparing for a screen recording? What are the affordances and limitations of having a scripted/prepared response, as opposed to an off-the-cuff review? Because QuickTime doesn’t allow for editing (and editing the recordings using other software would take too much time for this lesson), what are some ways students can react to “mistakes” in their recording, i.e., do they start it all over, or do they acknowledge if and when they misspoke and move beyond it? How might this influence their approach? What type of feedback do students want on their drafts?
  • From this discussion, put together a peer review template as a class.
  • Pair students up and have them electronically swap .pdfs of their infographics along with their draft cover letters (see “Student Preparation” in the right column of this lesson plan). If time remains, students can begin to look over their received draft and prepare their reviews.
  • During the following class, students will record their reviews (using again DWRL microphone headsets). Instructors might consider requiring students to bring specific talking points to class in order to facilitate this process. At the same time, off-the-cuff reviews might have certain affordances that instructors wants to explore.
  • Students upload and share their recordings with the writer and the instructor via Google Docs. Instructions are in the video below. (Uploading them to YouTube and emailing out the link is another option.)

Tutorial on uploading/sharing screen recording files via Google Docs. Video transcription available in description in YouTube.

Skills Workshop

This skills workshop includes three photo slidedecks. The first is teaches general QuickTime screen recording skills. The other two slidedecks discuss headphones that can be checked out through the DWRL. The second slidedeck focuses on headsets that plug into the computer’s headphone jack, and the third slidedeck deals with headphones that plug into the computer’s USB port.

General tutorial on using QuickTime’s screen recording software:

  • This is a screenshot of the Mac desktop. The "File" option in the menu bar along the top of the screen has been selected. In the dropdown menu, the third option from the top reads "New Screen Recording."

    To open QuickTime, click on the icon at the bottom of the screen. Then click “File” along the top bar. From there, click “New Screen Recording.” Screenshot by author.

  • This is a screenshot of the Mac desktop. In the top lefthand corner of the screen is a small rectangular black menu with "Screen Recording" at the top. Below the title is a red button. Beside the red button is an arrow, from which has dropped down another menu. This menu reads "Microphone" at the top, and below are the options "None" and "Built-in Microphone: External Microphone." There's a checkmark next to the "Built-in" option.

    The small rectangular recording screen will appear, but before you hit the red “Record” button, click the down arrow beside it to make sure the relevant microphone option is selected. In the photo, the built-in microphone option has been chosen, which relates to microphones plugged in to the computer’s headphone jack (more info on this in the next slidedeck). Screenshot by author.

  • This is a screenshot of a page on a website. The majority of the screen is white, and the url indicates that the website is the Digital Writing and Research Lab. In the middle of the screen, admist the white, is an infographic titled "Making a Persuasive Infographic." The infographic is split into three sections, all roughly the same size. Overlaying the infographic is a display screen that reads, "Click to record the full screen. Drag to record part of the screen. End recording by clicking the stop button in the menu bar."

    Before hitting record, it’s a good idea for students to pull up the text they’re going to review. Once the infographic is open, click the red “Record” button. Students have the option of recording the entire screen or selecting a portion of it. Screenshot by author.

  • This screenshot is of the same screen as the previous slide, only this only captures the top righthand corner of the screen. Only a bit of the infographic is in view. Instead, we see the corner of the web browser, a desktop folder, and menu icons in the corner of the screen.

    To end a recording, select the “Stop” icon (a black square with a circle around it) in the top right corner of the desktop screen. Screenshot by author.

The DWRL has two classroom sets of headsets instructors can check out, and each works (a little) differently with QuickTime. The headsets that plug into a computer’s headphone jack are the best option. The microphone picks up audio clearly, and it does a great job zeroing out environmental noise. And because the headphones work, students can listen to recordings individually, i.e., quietly.

If you speak with an Assistant Director when you’re planning your class, they should be able to ensure we have enough of the headsets that plug into the headphone jack (including the necessary adapter discussed below). But on the chance that your class has to use both types, I’ve put together a quick tutorial for each.

Information on “Y-cord” headsets that plug into the headphone jack:

  • This picture is of a black headphone/microphone headset lying on a computer table. Attached to the headset is a long black cord that leads to two different plugs (one yellow and the other pink). Near those is a Y-shaped adapter, with two jacks that match the two plugs. At the other end of the adapter is a single metalic plug.

    These headphones come with two parts. One is the headset, and the other is an adapter (the “Y-cord”). Without this adapter, the headsets won’t work. Photo by author.

  • This is a picture of the headset chord (via the adapter) plugged into the desktop computer's headphone jack. There are a few other cords also going in and out of the computer.

    The headset (via the adapter) plugs into the computer’s headphone jack. Photo by author.

  • This is a screenshot of the Mac desktop. In the top lefthand corner of the screen is a small rectangular black menu with "Screen Recording" at the top. Below the title is a red button. Beside the red button is an arrow, from which has dropped down another menu. This menu reads "Microphone" at the top, and below are the options "None" and "Built-in Microphone: External Microphone." There's a checkmark next to the "Built-in" option.

    The small rectangular recording screen will appear, but before you hit the red “Record” button, click the down arrow beside it to make sure the built-in microphone option is selected. Screenshot by author.

Information on USB headsets:

  • This picture is of a microphone/headphone headset lying on top of a computer desk. Attached to the headset is a long black cord, at the end of which is a USB plug.

    The headsets that connect through USB ports are good, but they catch a little more environmental noise than the other kind. Photo by author.

  • This photo is of the headset plugged into the back of the computer via its USB plug. There are a few other chords coming in and out of the computer as well.

    When plugging into a USB port, only the microphone works. This means that students will use either the built-in speakers to hear recordings (which will make the classroom considerably noisier, but still likely manageable) or they can plug in their personal headphones into the headphone jack. Photo by author.

  • This is a screenshot of the Mac desktop. In the top lefthand corner of the screen is a small rectangular black menu with "Screen Recording" at the top. Below the title is a red button. Beside the red button is an arrow, from which has dropped down another menu. This menu reads "Microphone" at the top, and below are three options "None," "Built-in Microphone: External Microphone," and "Unknown USB Audio Device." There's a checkmark next to the "Unknown USB" option.

    The USB headset’s microphone doesn’t work through the built-in microphone. Before students record, they need to click the down arrow beside the “Record” button to make sure the “Unknown USB Audio Device” option is selected. Everything else functions the same as indicated in the above slidedeck. Screenshot by author.

Assessment Suggestions


Assessing what students learned by using screen recording software during class time will be done informally by way of the class discussion and the ensuing creation of the review template. In terms of the peer reviews they record, students should share the files with the instructor, who can assess the reviews based on the criteria established in the template.


In addition to having students share the peer review they recorded, students can write a short reflection on their experience–both composing a review and receiving one. Students should discuss what they found helpful and what was not helpful. They should consider why they reacted the way they did and describe how this process might be improved in the future–both in terms of identifying personal mistakes and suggesting what they would do differently as well as theorizing how the use of screen recordings could be more effective overall.
Instructors can use the template in tandem with the writer’s cover letter to assess the quality of the reviews.

(Feature image credit: “Keyboard, Pen, Plan, Success” by JeongGuHyeok via Creative Commons)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *